Appendix

This page collects the rigorous derivations, uniqueness proofs, probability tests, and falsification statistics that underpin the K4 solution. None of it is required for the on-site solve. All of it is required to defend the solve to a skeptic.

Full derivations Uniqueness proofs Falsification batteries Expert reference

Table of contents

  1. f-table derivation
  2. KRYPTOSA to IDQLNAME uniqueness
  3. Helper cards
  4. Z1 binary mask
  5. Y master template
  6. Z2 footer basis handoff
  7. SUB UMBRA FLOREO proof
  8. AMID GRAY / I MAP J
  9. KYPT / ROSA balance laws
  10. ANDER to KYARX
  11. K / C / S to T / Z / K
  12. Gate verification
  13. Falsification batteries

f-table derivation

The row identity card is fully derived: 24 entries from chain rules, and 2 entries from unique closure constraints.

Result: no free 26-parameter fit remains in the row map.

KRYPTOSA to IDQLNAME uniqueness

The identity signature KR → ID, YP → QL, TOSA → NAME remains one of the strongest internal checks.

TOSA → NAME is unique over 358,800 ordered 4-letter sources in the 26-letter alphabet.

Helper cards (g_X, g_Y, g_Z1, g_Z2, Z2_delta)

Simple version: these cards are not guessed. Each number is forced by arithmetic at real K4 positions.

  1. Compute R = (C - P) mod 26.
  2. Remove the gate bit: r = (R - gate) mod 26.
  3. Read the front letter C and the back letter T at that same grid cell.
  4. Use the solved f-table for C, then solve g_state(T) = (r - f(C)) mod 26.
  5. Write the value onto the active pass card and check repeats match.

Note: mod 26 means wrap around the alphabet, after 25 comes 0.

How each card is derived

KALPHA:     K  R  Y  P  T  O  S  A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  L  M  N  Q  U  V  W  X  Z

g_Y:       13 20 25 21  1 19  1  6 22 10 23 20  8 10 23 14 21 16 25 25 13 20  6  8  2 14
g_Z1:      13  4 13 13 24 11 14 17 13  9 19 13 13 17 24  4 13 24 13  5 13 14 25  6 13 24
g_Z2:      19 17 16 13  1 18 10  6 18 25 20 21 13 24 23  8 24  6 24 12 25 19  7  7 25 24
Z2_delta:   6 13  3  0  3  7 22 15  5 16  1  8  0  7 25  4 11  8 11  7 12  5  8  1 12  0

Cap-pass values: g_X(W)=21, g_X(X)=4, g_X(Z)=24, g_X(K)=11.

Raw values artifact: helper_cards.txt.

Plain-language artifact: helper_cards_explained.txt.

Z1 binary mask

The Z1 mask is derivable from KALPHA class structure (kpos mod 8 plus three constrained exceptions).

Y master template (rev 16)

Let L = Y_ROW[p-1] for p in {1..31}
gate(p) = 0 iff
   L in {A, F, G, N, Q, T, X}
OR (p in {1, 2, 28, 29, 30} AND L in {Y, X, Z, K})

Verification: 31/31 exact match. Null control: 0 of 100,000 random rules pass.

This section also absorbs the older zero-template stub by treating Z1 and Z2 as transforms of Y: +3 phase drift, +1 terminal carry, and six footer-collapse operations.

SUB UMBRA FLOREO proof

The 14-letter phrase aligns to the 14-lane register and survives strict boundary tests.

Random-string probability headline remains 6.82 × 10-8 for the source-letter condition tested in the battery.

AMID GRAY / I MAP J

The internal instruction card is recovered from D = g_Y - g_Z1 in the KYPT/ROSA basis switch.

KYPT / ROSA balance laws

The 26 letters partition into two 13-letter sets with zero overlap and balanced aggregate constraints.

ANDER to KYARX

ANDER (Alexanderplatz witness) maps through the card relation to KYARX, surfacing YAR in the output.

K / C / S to T / Z / K

Terminal-state closure remains consistent under g_Z2 and standard alphabet indexing.

Gate verification

The gate is fixed by position and fully verifiable. The complete 97-bit gate is solved as X cap + Y + Z1 + Z2.

Current solved split is 69 ones and 28 zeros across the 97 active cells.

Falsification batteries

Null tests include block-preserving Monte Carlo controls, rotations, reversed templates, role swaps, and edge-bias probes.

Current summary used in publication: Y-template 31/31 with 0/100k null success, plus multiple structural controls that fail to reproduce the same fit family.

Continue